Underground Storage Tank (UST) Rule Revision
A brief history of UST regulations
- In the mid-1980’s, Congress passed a series of laws
intended to protect human health and the environment by
regulating USTs containing petroleum and other hazardous
substances.
- In 1988, EPA adopted regulations establishing a federal
UST program and minimum requirements for delegating federal
authority to states.
- In 1989, the Washington State legislature passed
an Act requiring the Department to Ecology to establish an
UST program that, at a minimum, meets the requirements for
delegation of the federal UST program and is consistent with
and no less stringent than the requirements in the federal
regulations (chapter 90.76 RCW).
- In 1990, Ecology adopted regulations establishing a
state UST program pursuant to the legislature’s direction
(chapter 173-360 WAC).
- In 1993, EPA approved Washington State’s UST program.
Washington State was one of the first states in the nation
to be granted state program approval for compliance and
enforcement.
- In 1991, 1995, and 1998, Ecology made several minor
revisions to the UST regulations, mostly governing the
administration of the program (such as compliance tags and
tanks fees).
- In 2005, United States Congress passed and President
Bush signed into law the Federal Energy Act. The Act
included new requirements for federal and delegated state
UST programs.
- In 2007, the Washington State legislature amended
chapter 90.76 RCW to incorporate changes required under the
Federal Energy Act of 2005.
Why is Ecology revising the UST regulations?
The UST Regulations (chapter 173-360 WAC)
are being revised to:
- Comply with new federal requirements adopted by Congress
in the
Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005.
The United States Congress passed and President Bush signed
the Act into law in 2005. Among many other things, this
federal law requires the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and delegated state agencies to adopt new
requirements for their UST programs. Some of the new
requirements include:
- An operator training program.
- Providing more specific direction for how to operate and maintain cathodic protection systems.
- Secondary containment and interstitial monitoring for new or replacement UST system components (double walled tanks and piping, and under dispenser containment sumps).
- Improve the effectiveness of the UST program based on twenty years of experience.
Some of those improvements include:
- Requiring the development of operation and maintenance plans for all UST systems.
- Providing more specific direction for how to operate and maintain cathodic protection systems.
- Modifying requirements governing the temporary closure of UST systems, including what must be done to remove systems from service, what requirements apply while systems are out of service, and what must be done to return systems to service.
- Clarifying financial responsibility requirements governing retroactive coverage and maintenance during temporary closure.
- Allowing use of site assessments to either reset retroactive dates or to suspend financial responsibility while UST systems are temporarily closed.
- Incorporating from guidance minimum requirements for site assessments.
- Improve the clarity and usability of the rule.
Where is Ecology currently in the rule-making process?
Ecology is currently drafting preliminary rule language and is seeking comments from interested persons on Parts 5-9 of the rule (see below). Upon completing drafts of Parts 1-4, Ecology will submit those Parts for review and comment as well. The comments received during this informal process will be evaluated and integrated into the proposed rule that will be filed with the code reviser’s office and submitted for formal public review and comment.
Informal Comment Period #1 on Preliminary Draft Rule
(October 13 – November 12, 2010)
CLOSED
Informal Comment Period #2 on Preliminary Draft Rule
(Dates to be determined)
Ecology is currently working on completing preliminary drafts of Parts 1-4 of chapter 173-360 WAC. Upon completion and internal review of those drafts, Ecology will submit those parts for your review and informal comment. Stay tuned!