Publication Summary

Title

Inorganic Arsenic Levels in Puget Sound Fish and Shellfish from 303(d) Listed Waterbodies and Other Areas

Month-Year PublishedDecember 2002
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
1553 kilobytes,  requires version 4.0 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software  get Acrobat Reader
Short Description

Total and inorganic arsenic were analyzed in eight fish and shellfish species to determine the appropriateness of placing five Puget Sound waterbodies on the 1998 303(d) list for exceeding EPA human health criteria in edible tissue. The waterbodies were Dyes Inlet, Port Washington Narrows, Sinclair Inlet, Port Orchard, and Eagle Harbor. The arsenic criterion is for inorganic arsenic, but the listings were based on total arsenic data. Results showed that inorganic arsenic concentrations either did not exceed the criterion or exceeded due to natural conditions. It is therefore recommended that these waterbodies be taken off the 303(d) list.

(Also see abstract below)
Publication Number02-03-057
Author(s)Johnson, A. and M. Roose
Print Availability
Request from the program.
Number of pages 24 pp. + app (46 total)
Keywords arsenic, fish, Puget Sound, results, shellfish, water
Subject Waterbodies
Eagle Harbor,
Port Orchard,
Agate Passage,
Rich Passage,
Sinclair Inlet,
Dyes Inlet,
Port Washington Narrows
map of Washington state showing locations of subject waterbodies
Related Publications TitleRelationship    
Quality Assurance Project Plan: Arsenic Speciation in Puget Sound Fish and Crabsimilar topic
Abstract Long Description

Total and inorganic arsenic were analyzed in eight fish and shellfish species to determine the appropriateness of placing five Puget Sound waterbodies on the 1998 303(d) list for exceeding EPA human health criteria in edible tissue. The waterbodies in question were Dyes Inlet, Port Washington Narrows, Sinclair Inlet, Port Orchard, and Eagle Harbor. The listings were based on total arsenic data.

Results showed the listing criterion of 0.006 ug/g inorganic arsenic was exceeded in all clam samples analyzed. However, this appears to be due to natural conditions in Puget Sound. All crab and fish samples were at or below the listing criterion. It is therefore recommended that these waterbodies be taken off the 303(d) list for arsenic exceedances in edible tissue (12 listings in all).

Link to EIM data for User Study ID AJOH0030


This page last updated March 10, 2008