Publication Summary

This rating system was designed to differentiate between wetlands in eastern Washington based on their sensitivity to disturbance, their significance, their rarity, our ability to replace them, and the functions they provide. The rating system, however, does not replace a full assessment of wetland functions that may be necessary to plan and monitor a project of compensatory mitigation.

The wetlands in Washington State differ widely in their functions and values. Some wetland types are common, while others are rare. Some are heavily disturbed while others are still relatively undisturbed. All, however, provide some functions and resources that are valued. These may be ecological, economic, recreational, or aesthetic. Managers, planners, and citizens need tools to understand the resource value of individual wetlands in order to protect them effectively.

This rating system was designed to differentiate between wetlands in eastern Washington based on their sensitivity to disturbance, their significance, their rarity, our ability to replace them, and the functions they provide. The rating system, however, does not replace a full assessment of wetland functions that may be necessary to plan and monitor a project of compensatory mitigation.

The rating categories are intended to be used as the basis for developing standards for protecting and managing the wetlands to reduce further loss of their value as a resource. Some decisions that can be made based on the rating include the width of buffers needed to protect the wetland from adjacent development, the ratios needed to compensate for impacts to the wetland, and permitted uses in the wetland. The Department of Ecology has developed recommendations for such protective standards and these are available in volume 2 of the Best Available Science report.

The rating system is primarily intended for use with vegetated, freshwater, wetlands as identified using the State of Washington delineation method (WAC 173-22-080). It also categorizes estuarine wetlands but does not characterize their functions. The rating system, however, does not characterize streambeds, riparian areas, and other valuable aquatic resources.