Publication Summary

Title

Evaluation of Probable Benefits and Costs Amendment of Chapter 173-160 WAC: Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells

Month-Year PublishedDecember 2008
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
206 kilobytes,  requires version 4.0 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software  get Acrobat Reader
Short Description

Ecology is issuing this Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Least Burdensome Alternative Analysis, under Chapter 34.05 RCW. Ecology will use the information developed in this analysis to ensure that the rule is consistent with legislative policy.

As required in the RCW 34.05.328(1) (d), before adopting the rule amendments, the director of Ecology must make the following determination:

Determine that the probable benefits of the rule are greater than its probable costs, taking into account both the qualitative and quantitative benefits and costs and the specific directives of the statute being implemented;

To fulfill the statutory requirement, this cost benefit analysis evaluates whether or not the probable benefits resulting from the amendments are greater than the probable costs. The analysis relies upon both qualitative and quantitative methods and concludes that the probable benefits of the amendments exceed the probable costs.

Publication Number08-11-052
Author(s)Bill Lum
ContactBill Lum, (360) 407-6648
Print Availability
Request from the program.
Number of pages 55
Keywords rule, rule amendment, water resource, well construction
Related Web ContentRule Amendment - Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells, Chapter 173-160 WAC

This page last updated November 4, 2009