Publication Summary

Title

Garfield Abbreviated Class II Inspection and Silver Creek Receiving Water Study.

Month-Year PublishedJuly 1987
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
1435 kilobytes,  requires version 4.0 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software  get Acrobat Reader
Short Description

Garfield WTP did not comply with its NPDES permit during a survey in October 1986. The plant exceeded the numerical limit and pollutant removal requirement for BOD. TSS was within its numerical limit, but did not meet the removal requirement.

(Also see abstract below)
Publication Number87-e08
Author(s)Determan, T.
Print Availability
Request from the program.
Not maintained in stock. Copy must be made from archive version.
Number of pages 21 pp.
Keywords creek, flow, Inspection, receiving water, silver, site investigation, study, toxic, waste, water, water quality
Subject Waterbodies
Silver Creek
map of Washington state showing locations of subject waterbodies
Abstract Long Description

Garfield WTP did not comply with its NPDES permit during a survey in October 1986. The plant exceeded the numerical limit and pollutant removal requirement for BOD. TSS was within its numerical limit, but did not meet the removal requirement. WTP effluent accounted for 70 percent of the flow in the upper reaches of Silver Creek and 20 percent at the creek mouth. Water quality violations in Silver Creek included depressed oxygen, excessive TSS, and toxic levels of un-ionized ammonia and total residual chlorine. Other stream sources include unknown sources above the discharge point and livestock wastes. Water quality in Silver Creek can be improved by eliminating direct discharge of the WTP to the creek, preventing livestock access, and eliminating the unknown upstream source.

This page last updated May 12, 2009