Publication Summary

Title

Yakima Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Class II Inspection, October 5-7,1992.

Month-Year PublishedNovember 1993
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
2822 kilobytes,  requires version 4.0 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software  get Acrobat Reader
Short Description

A Class II Inspection was conducted in October 1992 at the Yakima Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Yakima facility provides secondary treatment of domestic wastewater for the city of Yakima and adjoining urban areas. It also applies untreated wastewater from several food processing plants to sprayfields located along the Yakima River. Inspection data found that Yakima was providing adequate treatment for most pollutants limited by the NPDES permit.

(Also see abstract below)
Publication Number93-e28
Author(s)Hoyle-Dodson, G.
Print Availability
Request from the program.
Not maintained in stock. Copy must be made from archive version.
Number of pages 41 pp.
Keywords ammonia, BOD5, effluent, fecal coliform, guidelines, lake, NPDES, recommendations, river, sediment, site investigation, study, urban, wastewater treatment plant
Subject Waterbodies
Yakima River
map of Washington state showing locations of subject waterbodies
Abstract Long Description

A Class II Inspection was conducted in October 1992 at the Yakima Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Yakima facility provides secondary treatment of domestic wastewater for the city of Yakima and adjoining urban areas. It also applies untreated wastewater from several food processing plants to sprayfields located along the Yakima River. Inspection data found that Yakima was providing adequate treatment for most pollutants limited by the NPDES permit.

Total ammonia and fecal coliform effluent concentrations were of some concern. Influent loading for BOD5 exceeded monthly average design criteria included in the NPDES permit. Influent flow exceeded 85% of design criteria.

Revising plant criteria to reflect recent plant upgrades or submitting a plan and schedule to the Department of Ecology for the maintenance of adequate treatment is recommended.

This page last updated May 26, 2009