Publication Summary

Title

Lake Water Quality Assessment Program, 1993

Month-Year PublishedJanuary 1996
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
19782 kilobytes,  requires version 4.0 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software  get Acrobat Reader
Short Description

The objectives of the Washington State Department of Ecology′s (Ecology) Lake Water Quality Assessment Program are to identify lakes that are exhibiting water quality problems, to assess significant, publicly-owned lakes by estimating the trophic status of monitored lakes, and to promote public awareness of lake ecology and protection.

(Also see abstract below)
Publication Number96-304
Author(s)Smith, K.
Print Availability
Request from the program.
Cost for Washington state residents is $18.00. Cost for non-residents is $18.00.
Number of pages 520 pp. + app. (623 total)
Keywords assessment, bacteria, basin, chlorophyll, county, fecal coliform, grant, lake, methods, monitoring, nitrogen, phosphorus, recommendations, secchi disk, temperature, Thurston, total suspended solids, trend, trophic state index, trophic status, volunteer, water, Water Quality, watershed
Subject Waterbodies
Toad, Wiser Lake, Ketchum Lake, Samish, Howard Lake, Ki Lake, Martha Lake, Sunday Lake, Goss Lake, Lone Lake, Alice Lake, Blackmans Lake, Bosworth Lake, Flowing Lake, Loma Lake, Panther Lake, Roesiger, Stevens Lake, Sawyer Lake, Killarney, Ohop Lake, Rapjohn Lake, St. Clair, Whitman Lake, Gravelly Lake, Louise Lake, Spanaway Lake, Chambers Lake, Hicks Lake, Offutt Lake, Patterson, Ward Lake, Island Lake, Limerick Lake, Lost Lake, Phillips Lake, Spencer Lake, Summit Lake, Jump Off Joe Creek, Buck Lake, Florence Lake, Kitsap Lake, Long Lake, Mission Lake, Tiger Lake, Wooten Lake, Wye Lake, Leland Lake, Nahwatzel Lake, Black Lake, Mayfield Lake, Merwin Lake, Lacamas Lake, Silver Lake, Williams Lake, Leech Lake, Cle Elum Lake, Easton Lake, Keechelus Lake, Evergreen Lake, Moses Lake, Potholes Lake, Soap Lake, Wenatchee Lake, Pearrygin Lake, Twin, Big Lake, Conconully Lake, Osoyoos Lake, Eloika Lake, Ellen Lake, Deer Lake, Thomas Lake, Waitts Lake, Curlew Lake, Pierre Lake, Deep Lake, Big Meadow Lake, Leo Lake, Skookum, Sullivan Lake, Cranberry Lake
map of Washington state showing locations of subject waterbodies
Abstract Long Description

The objectives of the Washington State Department of Ecology′s (Ecology) Lake Water Quality Assessment Program are to identify lakes that are exhibiting water quality problems, to assess significant, publicly-owned lakes by estimating the trophic status of monitored lakes, and to promote public awareness of lake ecology and protection.

In 1993, Ecology staff collected water samples and profile data from 86 lakes. Water samples were collected in May and August from both the epilimnion and hypolimnion of stratified lakes, and were analyzed for total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and chlorophyll a. Samples for total suspended solids, total nonvolatile suspended solids, and fecal coliform bacteria were also collected from 18 of the 86 sampled lakes. To supplement data collected by Ecology staff, volunteers participating in Washington′s Citizen Lake Monitoring Program measured Secchi disk transparency and surface water temperature in 65 of the 86 lakes. Volunteers monitored their lakes bi-monthly from May through October. Most volunteers also completed a questionnaire on lake and watershed uses, and eight volunteers collected and stored water samples as part of an evaluation to determine the feasibility of having volunteers collect water samples. Carlson′s Trophic State Index (1977) was used to evaluate volunteer-collected Secchi depth data and Ecology-collected phosphorus and chlorophyll a data. Trophic state estimations were assigned to a total of 85 lakes: 36 lakes were oligotrophic or oligo-mesotrophic, 33 lakes were mesotrophic or meso-eutrophic, 16 lakes were eutrophic, and one lake was hyper-eutrophic.

Statistical trend in water clarity was evaluated for 17 lakes that were monitored by volunteers from 1989 to 1993. Using the seasonal Kendall test for trend, only three lakes exhibited statistically significant trends in water clarity. Big Meadow Lake (Pend Oreille County) and Lake Thomas (Stevens County) showed improving trends in water clarity (p < 0.01 and p < 0.20, respectively), and Long Lake (Thurston County) showed a decreasing trend in water clarity (p < 0.20).

From comparisons of mean Secchi depth, mean total phosphorus (TP), and mean chlorophyll within ecoregions, Soap Lake in Grant County had exceptionally high TP concentrations not only within its ecoregion, but in comparison to the rest of the lakes monitored in 1993. Soap Lake also did not fit into any of the traditional trophic state classifications, and was the only lake that was not assigned a trophic state. Mean Secchi depths from lakes monitored in the Puget Lowlands and Northern Rockies ecoregions were lower than mean Secchi depths in the Cascades and Columbia Basin ecoregions.

From evaluation of the relationships between Secchi depth, TP, and chlorophyll a, it was apparent that chlorophyll a data from the Lake Water Quality Assessment Program did not fit the predicted Secchi:TP:chlorophyll relationship. Factors affecting these relationships include non-phosphorus limitation, variability between sampling seasons, climatic variations, and possibly the methods used for storing and analyzing chlorophyll samples.

Recommendations for future monitoring seasons are the following: (1) labs should report all analytical data one decimal place beyond normal reporting limits, to allow for QA/QC analysis (particularly for total phosphorus data); (2) labs should report all QA/QC data along with sample results, to allow for comparisons between field and analytical variability; (3) methods for improving chlorophyll a yields should be investigated, including storing filters in acetone, and requesting that the lab use a 10 cm cell path with the spectrophotometer; (4) discontinue the investigation of having volunteers collect surface TP samples; (5) determine an acceptable TP field precision limit for the final program QAPP; and (6) continue the current practice of basing trophic state classifications on all available information and data that indicate trophic status.

This report includes a compilation of the sixty-five individual lake assessments (reports) which were written for volunteers who participated in the program, as well as data collected by Ecology staff from an additional 21 lakes.


This page last updated March 10, 2008