Publication Summary

Title

Persistence and Drift of the Aquatic Herbicide Diquat Following Application at Steilacoom and Gravelly Lakes

Month-Year PublishedJanuary 1997
Online Availability
View this publication in Acrobat PDF format
2036 kilobytes,  requires version 4.0 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader Software  get Acrobat Reader
Short Description

Diquat concentrations were monitored in the water column of Steilacoom and Gravelly Lakes following treatment with RewardŽ to control aquatic weeds. In Steilacoom Lake, diquat persisted at all four sampling sites for at least 12 days, with half-lives of 2.1 to 3.4 days. In Gravelly Lake, diquat persisted for 3 to 6 days following treatment. Diquat concentrations ranged from less than 0.5 to 91.2 mg/L in Steilacoom Lake, and from less than 0.5 to 60 mg/L in Gravelly Lake. Diquat was dispersed or drifted to untreated areas of both lakes, including the Steilacoom Lake outlet (Chambers Creek), within 24 hours after treatment.

(Also see abstract below)
Publication Number97-301
Author(s)Serdar, D.
Print Availability
Request from the program.
Number of pages 20 + app (41 total)
Keywords application, aquatic, creek, dissolved oxygen, drinking water, gravel, herbicide, lake, lakes, water, water quality
Subject Waterbodies
Steilacoom Lake,
Gravelly Lake
map of Washington state showing locations of subject waterbodies
Abstract Long Description

Diquat concentrations were monitored in the water column of Steilacoom and Gravelly Lakes following treatment with RewardŽ to control aquatic weeds. In Steilacoom Lake, diquat persisted at all four sampling sites for at least 12 days, with half-lives of 2.1 to 3.4 days. In Gravelly Lake, diquat persisted for 3 to 6 days following treatment. Diquat concentrations ranged from less than 0.5 to 91.2 mg/L in Steilacoom Lake, and from less than 0.5 to 60 mg/L in Gravelly Lake. Diquat was dispersed or drifted to untreated areas of both lakes, including the Steilacoom Lake outlet (Chambers Creek), within 24 hours after treatment.

Concentrations of diquat resulting from the nearly whole-lake treatment of Steilacoom Lake did not comply with the current RewardŽ label restriction for drinking water (3 days) based on a maximum allowable level of 10 mg diquat/L. In Gravelly Lake, which was spot-treated, resulting concentrations did comply with the 3-day restriction. Neither lake showed marked changes in water quality, including nutrient and dissolved oxygen concentrations, following treatment with diquat.

This page last updated August 17, 2011