|
Ecology home >
Environmental review >
Gateway Pacific
Environmental Review
Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point
Pacific International Terminals, a subsidiary of SSA Marine, has proposed building a deep-water marine terminal at Cherry Point in Whatcom County.
The proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal would handle import and export of up to 54 million dry metric tons per year of bulk commodities, mostly exporting coal.
In a related project, BNSF Railway Inc. has proposed adding rail facilities adjacent to the terminal site and installing a second track along the six-mile Custer Spur.
Permitting
Pacific International Terminals has submitted development applications to
Whatcom County and other agencies.
In 1997, Whatcom County issued a shoreline substantial development permit and a major development permit for construction and operation of the terminal. Because of changes to the size and scope of the proposal, the county has determined that a new shoreline permit is required for the project. The project must undergo a full environmental review before the company can obtain a new shoreline permit or other permits required for the project.
Environmental review
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the state Department of Ecology and Whatcom County will conduct a coordinated environmental review of the Pacific International and BNSF applications under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
The agencies have determined that the proposed export terminal and associated rail expansion require an
environmental impact statement (EIS). The lead agencies are responsible for identifying and evaluating how the proposed project would affect the environment. Ecology will ensure that the environmental reviews consider potential statewide effects of the project.
Steps in the environmental review process and estimated timeline:
February 2012 - Determine if there will be impacts: As co-leads in the state environmental review process, Ecology and Whatcom County have confirmed this and expect to issue a determination of significance.That determination will be used to launch the scoping process, expected in June.
March 2012 - Have an informational meeting: The co-lead agencies conducted a meeting Tuesday, March 20, 2012, in Bellingham to explain the environmental review process, the agencies’ roles and responsibilities, the public's opportunities to engage in the process, and to answer questions. See the video of the meeting, from the Center for New Media. Click here for the presentation.
May 2012 - Hire a contractor: The co-lead agencies will hire a contractor to help prepare an environmental impact statement. Funding must be provided by the applicant.
June 2012 – Begin scoping - decide what factors to analyze and what geographic area to consider: The co-lead agencies ask other agencies, tribes and the public to comment on what the environmental impact statement should analyze. Examples of possible factors to consider include stormwater, wetlands, air emissions, noise, and traffic. After considering comments, the lead agencies will decide what should be included in the environmental impact statement.
Fall 2012 – Begin preparing draft environmental impact statement (EIS): The contractor, under the direction of the co-lead agencies, will prepare the draft EIS according to the results of the scoping process. The purpose of an EIS is to provide the public and agency decision makers with information on likely adverse effects of a proposed project, as well as reasonable alternatives and measures to reduce those effects.
Fall 2013 – Issue draft EIS, open public comment period, have public hearing: The draft EIS will be circulated so that the public and other agencies are given an opportunity to comment on its accuracy and content before it is finalized. The public will be invited to a public hearing about the draft EIS. The co-lead agencies will consider and respond to public comments in the final EIS.
March 2014 – Issue final environmental impact statement: The final EIS will include responses to the comments made on the draft EIS.
Public involvement opportunities, approximate dates
- March 2012 – Pre-scoping informational meeting.
- Summer 2012 – Public meetings and 60-day comment period on SEPA/NEPA scoping.
- Fall 2013 – Public hearings and comment period on draft EIS.
Related documents (most recent)
- Related Proposals
- May 7,2012 - Ecology letter and comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on the permit application for the proposed Coyote Island Terminals LLC coal terminal at the Port of Morrow on the Columbia River in Oregon.
- Environmental Impact Statement Development
- Ecology's response to Whatcom Docs Physicians' email to Governor Gregoire
- Ecology’s response to Washington State Senators’ questions
- Joint environmental review oversight (Ecology, Whatcom County, Corps of Engineers)
- NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit for pre-construction terrestrial geotechnical investigation:
- Mar. 20, 2012 - Construction Stormwater Inspection Report, March 12 and 16, 2012
- Mar. 5, 2012 – Construction Stormwater Inspection Report, Feb. 29, 2012
- Nov. 4, 2011 – Ecology notice to Pacific International Terminals, Inc. that the pre-construction geotechnical investigation project has received water quality permit coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit.
- Sept. 26, 2011 – The public comment period is now closed for the application from Pacific International Terminals, Inc. for water quality permit coverage.
- Aug. 19, 2011 – Public Notice of Application from Pacific International Terminals, Inc. for water quality permit coverage. A public comment period will extend through Sep. 26, 2011.
- Aug. 15, 2011 - Notice of Intent Application from Pacific International Terminals, Inc.
(This Notice of Intent Application is preliminary and will change as the application process proceeds.)
- Aug. 4, 2011 - Ecology warning letter to Pacific International Terminals, Inc.
- Wetland mitigation plan:
- Sept. 23, 2011 - Ecology response to Gateway Pacific Terminal wetland mitigation plan for land-clearing violation
- Ecology agrees to co-lead the Gateway Pacific Terminal SEPA process:
Related information
Additional resources
|

SITE INFORMATION
Facility Site ID:
#22237
Location:
Cherry Point, Whatcom County
Region: Northwest Regional Office (NWRO)
Contact:
Alice Kelly
Regional Planner
Northwest Regional Office
Department of Ecology
Status:
Seven EIS contractor bids under review.
NEWS RELEASES
Mar. 5, 2012 - Meeting set to inform public about environmental review process for proposed Cherry Point terminal
Feb. 14, 2012 - Seven firms bid on Cherry Point terminal environmental review
Feb. 2, 2012 - Bid deadline extended for proposed Cherry Point terminal environmental review
Jan. 12, 2012 - Bids invited for environmental review of proposed Cherry Point terminal
Oct. 25, 2011 - Ecology, Whatcom County, Corps of Engineers agree on joint environmental review
Aug. 5, 2011 - Gateway Pacific Terminal site work lacked state permit
Jul. 15, 2011 - Ecology, Whatcom County to co-lead state environmental review of
proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point
Jun. 24, 2011 - Army Corps of Engineers to require EIS for Gateway Pacific Terminal proposal and Custer Spur line improvements
|