
|
| Chad Wiseman labeling a sample bottle after processing samples. |
This page provides a quick overview on how we conduct our sampling. For more detailed information on our field procedures, please see Stream Sampling Protocols for the Environmental Monitoring and Trends Section. That publication lists the laboratory methods we use as well. You may also want to refer to the Manchester Laboratory web pages for more information about lab analyses.
The majority of samples are collected as single surface grab samples from highway bridges. A few stations are sampled from the bank. We collect samples using a rope and weighted containers. Temperature is read in-stream using a long-line thermister; other samples are carried back to the van and processed. Twelve water quality constituents are monitored monthly, shown below, though we sample additional constituents at some stations. (We sample metals at 12 stations each year; procedures for that monitoring are not included here.) In addition, we collect instantaneous flow at long-term and some basin stations.
| Monitored water quality constituents | |||
| ammonia, total | conductivity | fecal coliform bacteria | nitrate + nitrite, total |
| nitrogen, total | oxygen, dissolved | pH | phosphorus, soluble reactive |
| phosphorus, total | suspended solids, total | temperature | turbidity |
Consistency is particularly important in long-term monitoring programs. Normally, procedural or analytical changes will result in improved precision or reduced bias. Most changes will have only a minor affect on a synoptic analysis of the data but even improvements in procedures can mislead the unwary analyst of long-term trends. For this reason, we try to follow standardized procedures for equipment cleaning, maintenance, and calibration; sample collection, preparation, and shipping; and data management.*
* For more information on standard procedures, see Stream Sampling Protocols for the Environmental Monitoring and Trends Section.
Because our data are used to assess water bodies for trends, as well as possible 303(d) listing and subsequent TMDL investigations, we work hard to produce quality data. We follow strict protocols for sampling and processing. We spend a lot of time calibrating our meters. Conductivity meters are calibrated twice daily and pH meters three times. We also check the calibration whenever a pH reading exceeds state standards. We use modified Winkler titrations to measure dissolved oxygen because they are more accurate than meters and because we often change elevation between sample stations.
To evaluate data quality, we collect a second set of samples at one randomly-chosen station during each sampling trip. This tests total variability, including short-term, instream variability. The second sample set is split in the field (to assess variability due to lab and field processing, plus analytical variability), and one of the splits is split again at the lab (to assess variability due to only lab processing plus analytical variability). Results are reported in our annual reports and there is an interesting display of our precision on our home page.
Data quality requirements are documented in our "Quality Assurance Monitoring Plan" (Hallock and Ehinger, 2003) and in its addendum.
Copyright © Washington State Department of Ecology. See http://www.ecy.wa.gov/copyright.html.