|Mattoon Lake, located near the town of Ellensburg in Central Washington, was selected as a site to study Eurasian watermilfoil control using weevils native to North America.|
Freshwater aquatic plant monitoring is conducted by the Department of Ecology’s Environmental Assessment Program. The monitoring program’s purpose is to track aquatic plant community changes in lakes and rivers throughout the state, concentrating on invasive non-native species such as Eurasian milfoil. In addition, targeted research and control projects have been undertaken as time allows. The aquatic plant monitoring program was established as part of the Freshwater Aquatic Weed Program in 1991. This program provides expertise on aquatic plant issues and a source of grant money (see Aquatic Weeds Financial Assistance Information) for local invasive aquatic plant management projects.
Invasive non-native plants have been introduced to Washington either accidentally or on purpose by humans. They evolved in other parts of the world, and are brought to this region without natural enemies such as plant-eating insects and diseases that normally keep their growth in check in their homeland.
The aquatic invasive plants found in Washington were all originally brought here as ornamental plants for aquariums or water gardens. These ornamental plants tend to be naturally hardy and able to withstand the tough growing conditions found in aquariums. Thus, when they are introduced to Washington’s waters, they often thrive and out-compete native plants.
For recommendations on what native plants can be used as alternatives to non-native ornamental water garden and aquarium plants, see our Native Plants for Aquatic Gardens and Aquariums publication. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/0603004.html. There are also publications recommending upland non-invasive ornamental plants from the State Noxious Weed Board http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/nwcb_publications.htm.
Washington state has a State Noxious Weed Control Board that, among other things, maintains lists of the most threatening invasive non-native plant species. (For more information on the list and aquatic plants included see Overview of Noxious Freshwater Weeds in Washington.
The listed aquatic weeds that are monitored by Ecology include:
|Butomus umbellatus (flowering rush)||description||distribution|
|Cabomba caroliniana (fanwort)||description||distribution|
|Egeria densa (Brazilian elodea or egeria)||description||distribution|
|Epilobium hirsutum (hairy willow herb)||description||distribution|
|Glyceria maxima (reed sweetgrass)||description||distribution|
|Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrilla)||description||distribution|
|Hydrocharis morsus-ranae (Europeans frog-bit)||description||distribution|
|Iris pseudacorus (yellow flag iris)||description||distribution|
|Ludwigia hexapetala (water primrose)||description||distribution|
|Ludwigia peploides (floating primrose willow)||description||distribution|
|Lysimachia vulgaris (garden loosestrife)||description||distribution|
|Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife)||description||distribution|
|Myriophyllum aquaticum (parrotfeather)||description||distribution|
|Myriophyllum heterophyllum (variable leaf milfoil)||description||distribution|
|Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian milfoil)||description||distribution|
|Nymphae odorata (fragrant waterlily)||description||distribution|
|Nymphoides peltata (yellow floating heart)||description||distribution|
|Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass)||description||distribution|
|Phragmites australis (common reed)||description|
|Potamogeton crispus (curly leaf pondweed)||description||distribution|
|Sagittaria graminea (grass leaf arrowhead)||description||distribution|
|Schoenolectus mucronatus (rice field bulrush)||description||distribution|
|Utricularia inflata (bladderwort)||description||distribution|
Also see Invasive Nonnative Freshwater Plants for additional information on many of these species. Note, wetland and shoreline plants included in this list likely are more widely distributed than our database (below) would indicate since we generally only monitor waterbodies with public boat access.
Several research projects have been undertaken to further our knowledge of aquatic plant distribution and to investigate various control methods for aquatic weeds. These are described in more detail below:
Every year, we conduct site visits to identify aquatic plants, evaluate plant community structure, and detect the existence or potential for problems, particularly as they relate to invasive non-native aquatic plants. Results of these surveys can be accessed here online.
Or, download database file (454 kilobytes zip file, Microsoft Access 2002 format).
Online results are current through survey-year 2012.
Please note that our focus is on lakes with public boat access. The sites are not selected randomly, so data cannot be used to make inferences about the overall condition of Washington's lakes.
Class A noxious weeds are defined as non-native species whose distribution in Washington is still limited. Preventing new infestations and eradicating existing infestations are the highest priority. Eradication of all Class A weeds is required by law. (link to http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/searchResults.asp?class=A for the full list of Class A weeds)
Some Aquatic Weed Fund monies are spent each year in efforts focusing on eradication of Class A aquatic weeds. The plants targeted so far have been hydrilla, variable leaf milfoil and flowering rush.
Hydrilla: Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) is considered one of the worst aquatic weeds in the world. In Washington, only two connected lakes have been found with this species; Pipe and Lucerne Lakes in King County. Hydrilla was first identified in these small joined lakes in 1994. Work began in 1995 to eradicate the population from both lakes. No Hydrilla has been found in either lake since 2006, but continued monitoring takes place each year to ensure eradication success. Ecology funded much of the eradication effort, however King County Lake Stewardship staff handled all of the work either themselves or contracted it out. See http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/waterandland/lakes/plants/weed-identification/hydrilla/eradication-project/reports.aspx for additional information.
Variable leaf milfoil: Variable leaf milfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) was added to the class A noxious weed list in 2008. This resulted from advances in milfoil genetic analysis that confirmed the presence of this plant in five lakes in Pierce and Thurston Counties. Through the Aquatic Weed Fund, Ecology has provided money to the county noxious weed control programs to support eradication efforts including herbicide and diver hand pulling. We have monitored remnant populations of the variable leaf milfoil in each lake during all years of treatment. As of 2012 the status of each lake was as follows:
Flowering rush: Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) was added to the class A noxious weed list in 2009. At the time, we thought there were only two populations in the state, one in Silver Lake, Whatcom County and one along a small stretch of the Yakima River in Benton County. In the summer of 2009 substantially more flowering rush was found along the lower Yakima River, and in 2010 it was found in Lake Spokane and Little Falls Reservoir on the Spokane River, the Columbia River at the mouth of the Yakima, and one patch was found in the Pend Oreille River. In 2011 and 2012 those populations continued to expand, and it was found in 9-Mile reservoir, upstream of Lake Spokane. Control efforts to-date include spraying all of the patches on the Yakima River, diver hand-pulling and covering part of the population in Lake Spokane and Pend Oreille River and an herbicide trail in Silver Lake. Efforts to control the spread of this plant will continue.
This project was undertaken in 1998 and 1999 on Loon Lake in Stevens County. It was summarized and published in the Journal of Aquatic Plant Management. The whole article can be accessed online at http://www.apms.org/japm/vol39/v39p117.pdf. The following abstract is taken from this publication:
A patchy distribution of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) in Loon Lake was treated with the herbicide 2,4-D during July 1998. Aquatic plant biomass and frequency data were collected before treatment, and six weeks and one year after treatment. Aqueous concentrations of 2,4-D increased to 1 to 2 mg/l within one day of treatment, and were below detection limits by one week after treatment. Macrophyte data were analyzed to assess the herbicide's impacts on Eurasian watermilfoil as well as the rest of the aquatic plant community. Results showed a significant decrease in Eurasian watermilfoil biomass and frequency in treated areas 6 weeks after treatment, which continued through the one year post-treatment samples. No other plant species were significantly affected by the herbicide application.
Kress Lake is a small lake formed in an abandoned gravel pit in Cowlitz County (southwest Washington). This project was undertaken in 2000 to investigate the herbicide endothall's impact on both the noxious weed Eurasian watermilfoil and the native plant community. Monitoring continued until 2003 and the results were published in the Journal of Aquatic Plant Management in 2004. In 2005 additional plant frequency data were collected and were not published, but are described below.
The following is the abstract from the publication. The whole paper can be accessed on the Aquatic Plant Management Society website http://www.apms.org/japm/vol42/v42p109.pdf.
A dense mat-forming population of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) was interfering with fishing and recreation in a small western Washington lake. A low concentration (1.5 mg/L active ingredient) of the herbicide endothall formulated as Aquathol® K was used in 2000 to attempt to selectively control the Eurasian watermilfoil. Aquatic plant biomass and frequency data were collected before treatment, ten weeks after treatment and during the growing season for 3 additional years. Macrophyte data were analyzed to assess the herbicide's impacts on Eurasian watermilfoil as well as the rest of the aquatic plant community. Results showed a significant decrease in Eurasian watermilfoil biomass and frequency 10 weeks after treatment. The Eurasian watermilfoil continued to be present, but at a significantly reduced level through the remainder of the study (3 years after treatment). Of the native plant species, large-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton amplifolius Tucker.) frequency and biomass was significantly reduced after treatment. Common elodea (Elodea canadensis Rich.), muskgrass (Chara sp. Vallaint.) and bladderwort (Utricularia sp. L.) all increased significantly after treatment.
In 2005 additional plant frequency data were collected following the same methods used in the original study. A table comparing the 2005 data to the pretreatment data from 2000 is below.
Table: Percent frequency of common aquatic plants in Kress Lake pretreatment and five years post treatment. Significant differences indicated in bold (p<0.05).
|Coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum)||0||26||0.000|
|Musk grass (Chara sp)||25||52||0.000|
|Common elodea (Elodea canadensis)||2||79||0.000|
|Eurasian milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum)||84||76||0.204|
|Large leaf pondweed (Potomogeton amplifolius)||35||21||0.029|
|Bladderwort (Utricularia sp)||1||33||0.000|
There was no significant difference between the frequency of Eurasian milfoil in 2005 and 2000, so it returned to essentially pretreatment levels.
The big leaf pondweed frequency was still at significantly reduced levels compared with before treatment. The other common native species, however, were all still found at significantly higher frequencies in 2005 than before treatment.
The aquatic invasive non-native plant egeria (Egeria densa Planch.) in Battle Ground Lake (Clark County) was treated with the herbicide diquat in 2003. The purpose of this project was to monitor plant community changes and water quality before treatment and up to three years after treatment. There was a significant reduction in egeria frequency and biomass after the herbicide treatment. The diquat spread throughout the lake and persisted at low levels in the water column for at least two weeks after treatment. There was a slight decrease in surface water dissolved oxygen and water transparency after the herbicide treatment due to increased algae growth.
This study was published in the Journal of Aquatic Plant Management in the January 2007 issue. Publication No. 07-03-030. Also available at http://www.apms.org/japm/vol45/v45p35.pdf
In 2002 Loomis Lake (Pacific County, coastal southwest Washington) was treated with the slow-acting systemic herbicide fluridone to control both Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Brazilian elodea (Egeria densa). We monitored the aquatic plant community before treatment and for three years after treatment. The Department of Fish and Wildlife monitored the fish community during this same time period. A paper presenting results from both studies has been published in the Journal of Aquatic Plant Management (January 2009 issue). The abstract is below:
Loomis Lake, a long narrow shallow lake on the coast of Washington State, had a submersed plant community dominated by the invasive non-native species Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) and egeria (Egeria densa Planch.). In 2002, the whole lake was treated with the liquid formulation of the aquatic herbicide fluridone (1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone). We monitored aquatic plant frequency of occurrence and biomass before herbicide application (2002) and for 3 years after the treatment (2003 to 2005). The fish population was assessed one year prior to herbicide treatment (2001) and three years post treatment (2005). Prior to domination by invasive macrophytes, the lake had a diverse native plant community with low-growing species in the deep water providing open water. During that time the lake supported a stocked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) and warmwater fishery.
As invasive macrophytes took over, the native plant richness decreased, the trout stocking program ceased, and small yellow perch (Perca flavescens Mitchill) dominated the fish community. The herbicide treatment resulted in a significant reduction in frequency (86% for egeria, 84% for Eurasian watermilfoil) and biomass (98% for egeria, 99% for Eurasian watermilfoil) of the invasive species for three years. The native submersed plant community was also significantly reduced for the study duration. We attributed this to fluridone use at a non-selective rate and poor light penetration caused by wind induced sediment entrainment. After treatment the growth of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides Lacepede) and pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus Linnaeus) increased. In addition, the abundance of small yellow perch decreased while abundance of larger pumpkinseed sunfish increased.
This study was published in the Journal of Aquatic Plant Management in the January 2009 Issue. Publication No. 09-09-033. Also available at http://www.apms.org/japm/vol47/v47p031_2009.pdf
In 2004 Capitol Lake (Thurston County, City of Olympia) was treated with the selective herbicide triclopyr to control a burgeoning population of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum). Aquatic plant data were collected by Ecology before treatment, and by Thurston County after treatment. The final data were collected in 2006. If you would like additional information on the project, please contact Jenifer Parsons.
The aquatic invasive non-native plant Eurasian milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) has been in Washington State since at least 1965. Since that time it has been introduced to more than 100 lakes and reservoirs and many major rivers including the Columbia, Okanogan, Snake and Pend Oreille Rivers (distribution map).
When the distribution of an invasive non-native species reaches the proportions of Eurasian milfoil, biological control agents are often sought to aid in their management. (Biological control is the use of natural enemies such as insects and diseases to reduce the damage caused by a pest population such as an invasive non-native plant.)
Several insects and diseases have been observed to damage Eurasian milfoil growth. The one that has received the most attention to date is the milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei) (a beetle in the family Curculionidae). This weevil is native to the northern part of the United States, including Washington (Tamayo and Grue 1996). The weevil’s native host is the native northern milfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum), however, if the weevil is reared on Eurasian milfoil it will prefer it over northern milfoil. The weevils spend their entire life cycle on milfoil. The adults eat leaves on the growing tips, and larvae mine into the stem causing a reduction in plant buoyancy. An excellent summary of milfoil weevil life history and research is available through the milfoil biocontrol website.
Between 2002 and 2008 we conducted a milfoil weevil rearing, augmentation and monitoring project. The results have been published, and the paper is available (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/1203017.html). The abstract from the paper follows:
This study was undertaken to gain experience propagating the milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz) and to monitor the macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish communities at a milfoil weevil augmentation site between 2002 to 2008, in a small lake in central Washington State. The milfoil weevil propagation was time consuming, but not difficult. Over the course of the project, monitoring showed a significant decrease in the frequency and biomass of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L) and no change or a slight increase in frequency and biomass of other macrophytes at the augmentation site. The milfoil weevil took 5 years to establish in the lake, during which time a midge (Chironomidae) population started to control Eurasian milfoil growth. The fish community changed from one dominated by stunted pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus L) to a more balanced community of predator and prey fish. Fish diet analysis indicated that fish predation likely influenced herbivorous macroinvertebrate populations. This study supports the theory that fish and macroinvertebrate herbivores influence lake trophic interactions, affecting primary productivity as macrophyte growth.
Additional information on milfoil weevils in Washington:
During the later 1990’s Ecology’s Aquatic Weed Management Fund partially supported research on the milfoil weevil in Washington conducted at the University of Washington. Several papers have been published as a result of this work. (See list of publications below.)
As a result of the research conducted by the University of Washington, Ecology, and others, naturally occurring populations of the milfoil weevil are known from the following locations in Washington:
|County||Lake Name||Year of milfoil weevil observation|
|Ferry||Curlew Lake||1993, 1996, 1997, 2008|
|Grant||Burke Lake||1999, 2002, 2005-2010|
|Grant||Canal Lake||1996, 1997|
|Grant||Corral Lake||1998, 1999|
|Grant||Evergreen Lake||1997, 1998, 1999|
|Grant||Priest Rapids Res||2004|
|Grant||Stan Coffin Lake||1997, 1999, 2002 - 2005|
|Grant||Warden Lake||1997, 1999, 2001, 2003|
|King||Sawyer Lake||1996, 1997, 1998, 1999|
|Kittitas||Mattoon Lake||2007, 2008|
|Lincoln||Fishtrap Lake||1996, 1997|
|Okanogan||Osoyoos Lake||2010, 2012|
|Pend Oreille||Davis Lake||1999|
|Pend Oreille||Eloika Lake||2001, 2002|
|Pend Oreille||Fan Lake||1997, 1999|
|Pend Oreille||Horseshoe Lake||2010|
|Pend Oreille||Sacheen Lake||1999|
|Spokane||Badger Lake||1997, 1999|
|Spokane||Williams Lake||1996, 1997, 1999|
In 2002, we monitored weevil activity in Stan Coffin Lake into the fall.. The weevils were still evident, though in reduced numbers, in mid-October with a water temperature of 55˚ F (13˚ C). By November 1, 2002, the weevils were very difficult to locate with only one weevil found in 20 minutes of snorkeling; the water temperature was 43˚ F (6˚ C).
Additional information on how we raised milfoil weevils is available in the weevil rearing document.
Divens, M. 2002 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Spokane Office. Personal communication.
Hanson, T., C. Eliopoulos, and A. Walker. 1995. Field collection, laboratory rearing and in-lake introductions of the herbivorous aquatic weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, in Vermont: Year 2. Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Waterbury, VT. 41 pp.
Lord, P.H., J.G. Wells, and A.L. Armstrong. 2003. BFS Technical Report #21: Establishing a connection: a survey of Eurasian water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), its insect herbivores and fish in eight Madison County lakes. Suny Oneonta Biological Field Station; Cooperstown, NY. 46 pp.
Newman, R. 2003. University of Minnesota. Personal communication.
Sutter, T. J., and R. M. Newman. 1997. Is predation by sunfish (Lepomis spp.) an important source of mortality for the Eurasian watermilfoil biocontrol agent Euhrychiopsis lecontei ? Journal of Freshwater Ecology 12: 225-234.
Tamayo, M. and C. Grue. 1996. Evaluation of the native status in North America for the weevil Euhrychiopsis lecontei. University of Washington cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Seattle, WA
Tamayo, M. and C. Grue. 2004. Developmental performance of the milfoil weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on watermilfoils in Washington State. Environ. Entomol. 33(4): 872-880.
Tamayo, M., C. Grue and K. Hamel. 2004. Densities of the milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis lecontei) on native and exotic watermilfoils. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 19(2): 203-211.
Tamayo, M., C. Grue, and K. Hamel. 2000. The relationship between water quality, watermilfoil frequency, and weevil distribution in the State of Washington. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 38: 112-116.
Tamayo, M. 2003. Developmental performance, abundance and habitat of the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, in Washington State. PhD Dissertation. University of Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Seattle, WA
The objective of this project was to see if the non-native plant curly leaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) was a significant component of the plant community and if so, to see how the population changed over the growing season.
Crescent Bar is located on the Columbia River in central Washington. It is about 20 miles downstream of Wenatchee in Grant County. It is a resort area with a small marina and boat access located on the protected side of an island formed by a large sand bar. It is a heavily used recreation area, particularly in spring and summer months. Sampling stations were located along three transects, one at the north end of the island close to the main river, the second was near the boat launch/marina and the third was on the back (east) side of the island.
Sampling began in early April 2005, and continued monthly through late October 2005. Sample points were located approximately 20 meters apart along the transects and returned to each visit by using a GPS (Global Positioning System). At each point samples were collected by tossing a sampling rake four times and recording the species collected with each toss.
Below is a table of the percent of rake samples where the most common species were present.
|Date||Curly Leaf pondweed||Eurasian milfoil||American waterweed (Elodea canadensis)||Coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum)|
These data indicate that at least in this rather confined area of the Columbia River, the curly leaf pondweed was at its greatest frequency in June and July, then declined to the point of not being collected in any of the samples by fall (though it could still be found as a rare small plant in places other than the sample points, so it wasn’t completely gone). This is similar to what has been found in the Midwest (Catling and Dobson 1985), although the die-off appeared to happen a little later in the summer here. This could be due to cooler water temperatures in the Columbia River than in areas studied in the Midwest (Madsen 2005) (surface water temperature was; early June 14° C, early August 20° C). The Eurasian milfoil was most frequently collected toward the end of the summer, but its distribution was patchy. The dominant plant throughout the summer was American waterweed (Elodea canadensis), a common native species. Another native plant, coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum), was common and tended to dominate in the deeper water. In general, the plant growth in the study area was quite dense, especially in July and August, but it was a mix of the above four common species and other less common native plants. It was not a monoculture of any one of them.
Catling, P.M., I. Dobson. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds 69 Potamogeton crispus L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65: 655-668
Madsen, J.D. 2005. Mississippi State University. Personal communication.
For more information about aquatic plants, algae, and lakes, see the Water Quality Program.
Copyright © Washington State Department of Ecology. See http://www.ecy.wa.gov/copyright.html.