Evaluation Criteria

1. The project helps meet the timetable for local updates of master programs as outlined in RCW 90.58.080 as determined by:

• The degree to which the project leads to a completed comprehensive SMP update
• The year that the project proponent is required to update (i.e. 2011 adopters will score higher for this criteria)

2. The application indicates that the proposal makes efficient use of grant funds by:

• Incorporating use of existing information and resources
• Addressing more miles or area of shoreline per dollar requested
• Matching or making use of other fund sources
• Collaboration with other jurisdictions
• Coordination with other planning efforts of the community

3. The application proposes a scope of work that is achievable within the time-frame of the award, as indicated by:

• Amount of pre-grant work committed to the task
• A reasonable and effective methodology for conducting required work
• A reasonable and effective proposal for coordinating with all shoreline interests in the community
• Applicant demonstrates readiness to proceed (hire additional staff or readiness to initiate consultant selection process )

4. The application proposes a scope of work that is realistic, as indicated by:

• Reasonable and adequate identification of tasks
• Reasonable and adequate time allocation to tasks
• Recognition of relationships between tasks in completion of SMP elements
• Reasonable and adequate funding of staff and contracted services

5. The application indicates that the jurisdiction is ready to undertake update of the SMP and adopt the final product, as indicated by:

• Demonstration of local need (i.e. SMP inconsistencies with other regulations, changes in development patterns and growth rates, critical shorelines at risk or other factors)
• Recognition of the need to address the issue(s) and support for the project from community leaders and elected officials

---

Ecology Home l SEA Program Home l SEA Program Grants