Milfoil Infested Lake Control Strategies.......Eradication – Hand Pulling and Bottom Barrier InstallationHand Pulling: During hand pulling, milfoil plants are manually removed from the lake bottom, with care taken to remove the entire root crown and to not create fragments. In deeper water, divers are usually needed to reach the plants. Bottom Barrier Installation: Bottom barriers are semi-permanent materials that are laid over the top of milfoil beds and are analogous to using landscape fabric to suppress the growth of weeds in yards. Click here to learn more about bottom barriers and their environmental impacts, Click here to learn more about installing bottom barriers. Waterbodies suitable for handpulling and installation of bottom barriers: Due to expense and the time intensive nature of manual methods, sites suitable for hand pulling and bottom screening are limited to lakes or ponds only lightly infested with Eurasian watermilfoil. This method is suitable for very early infestations of milfoil and for follow-up removal after a whole lake fluridone treatment, a 2,4-D treatment, or diver dredging. To be cost-effective, generally the total amount of milfoil in the waterbody should be three-acres or less in area, if all the milfoil plants were grouped together in one location. If the infestation has advanced beyond this point, it is more effective to consider other eradication techniques such as aquatic herbicides. This method may also be applicable in waterbodies where no herbicide use can be tolerated such as in a lake used as a municipal drinking water supply. Theoretically, these methods could be used in any waterbody to eradicate milfoil; however the costs for large scale projects would become astronomical. Special Considerations: Factors that affect the success of hand pulling include: water clarity, sediment type, suppression of milfoil fragments, density of native aquatic plants, and effort expended. It is especially important to have good visibility for the divers to locate milfoil plants. Sometimes diving is only effective in the spring or fall, or during periods between algal blooms. If water clarity is very poor, manual eradication methods may not be suitable for the waterbody. Hydraulic Project Approval is required for all hand pulling and bottom barrier projects. This permit is given in a pamphlet called Aquatic Plants and Fish and is available from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Description of a milfoil eradication project in Washington using handpulling and bottom barriers: Lakes where manual methods are being used for milfoil eradication typically have milfoil lightly scattered singly or in small patches within the littoral zone. To determine the extent of the infestation, the littoral zone of the lake is surveyed immediately prior to starting control work and milfoil locations are mapped and Global Positioning System (GPS) points established. The survey can be conducted prior to the removal effort or take place during the removal effort. Hand pulling can begin as soon as milfoil can be easily seen and identified - generally in the spring or as soon as it is discovered in the lake. Despite milfoil’s tendency to fragment more readily during the fall, removal should be undertaken as soon as possible after the discovery of milfoil in the lake, no matter how late in the season. Survey Techniques Both surface and underwater surveys should be conducted several times during the growing season. During the surface survey, a surveyor moves slowly through the littoral zone in a boat, looking into the water (often using a viewing tube), and marking the locations of milfoil plants with buoys. Surveyors advise wearing wide-brimmed hats, polarized sunglasses, and looking straight down into the water. Wind, rain, or surface disturbance, such as boat wakes, interferes with the ability to see. Morning to noon is often the most suitable time for survey work. The surface survey is immediately followed by an underwater diver survey. Because known milfoil locations have been marked during the surface surveys, the divers can concentrate their efforts at these locations. Since diver time is expensive, it can be cost-effective to conduct surface surveys before underwater surveys. Arline Fullerton, an experienced scientific diver, describes the survey techniques used by Thurston County to locate pioneering colonies of Eurasian watermilfoil in Long Lake.
Hand Pulling Techniques During hand pulling, the divers dig around and beneath the plant roots with their hands or with a tool and gently lift the entire plant out of the sediment. The ease of removal is dependent on sediment type. Milfoil plants can be readily removed from loose or flocculent sediments. In hard sediments or rocky substrate, hand tools must be used to loosen the root crown before the plant can be dislodged. Sometimes fine roots are left behind; these will not regrow, but it is important to remove the root crown (the fleshy, fibrous roots at the base of the stem). Once plants are removed, the diver places them into bags for transportation to the surface. Sometimes divers may use a suction device to deliver the plant to the surface. The plant is sucked up into the boat (generally using a gold dredge), the plants are retained in a sieve, and the water is discharged back into the lake. In locations with denser milfoil colonies, divers should make several passes through the area to ensure that all plants have been located and removed. As the divers work, the people in the support boat mark the locations of milfoil plants. An accurate location is important since the areas need to be resurveyed a few weeks later. There have been instances when small fragments or plants have been overlooked and have become large plants upon resurvey. Removed plants can be used for compost rather than having to be discarded as solid waste. If colonies are too large for efficient hand pulling or if repeated visits to the same site indicate that too many fragments or plants are being missed, bottom barriers should be installed. Burlap bottom barrier (or other biodegradable material) should be placed over the plants and anchored to the lake bottom using natural materials such as rocks or sandbags. The burlap should cover and extend well beyond the growth zone of the plants. Burlap or other natural materials are preferred because they will naturally decompose over a 2-3 year period. Some lake groups hire contract divers and surveyors to conduct manual plant removal activities. Other lakes have relied on volunteer efforts. If volunteers are used, they must be trained in plant identification and proper removal methods. General Impacts of
hand pulling Hand pulling may increase turbidity in the area of removal. This can affect the efficacy of removal if the turbidity interferes with the ability of the divers to see the milfoil plants. In a Diver's Own Words - A Description of Diver Hand Pulling Arline Fullerton, scientific diver, provides this advice:
Follow-up to treatment: Follow-up is essential to ensure the success of eradication. Even a few milfoil fragments left in the lake can start a new infestation or boaters may reintroduce milfoil into the lake. Diver and surface inspections should continue at least twice a year during the growing season. Survey work should be as frequent as can be afforded since small milfoil plants or fragments may be easily overlooked. Long term follow-up is the key! Once milfoil is discovered in a lake, it generally requires continual maintenance to keep it at low levels. Even if milfoil appears to have been eradicated, it often is reintroduced by boaters. As long as the lake group continues surveying, new introductions can be identified quickly and targeted for removal before milfoil can reestablish in the lake. Although labor intensive, these manual techniques have been used to successfully eradicate milfoil in a drinking water reservoir in Washington. |
| Return to Aquatic Plants and
Lake Page
|