NOTICE: Ecology's web applications will be unavailable Wednesday, Nov. 29 from 5:30 to 7:30pm, for scheduled maintenance.
Printer friendly version.
In 2000, the state Legislature created Cost Reimbursement as an alternative for water right applicants to speed up the decision-making on their application. In 2010, changes were made to cost reimbursement in the state water code. Here are answers to basic questions on how the cost reimbursement process currently works.
Q: What is cost reimbursement?
A: Cost reimbursement is a type of contract between a water right applicant and the Department of Ecology (Ecology). Under this contract, applicants assume the full cost of processing their water right application, with some or all of the work performed by Ecology’s consultant. Presently, Ecology has eight consulting firms pre-approved to do this work.
The cost reimbursement option allows a private consultant to do the work that Ecology hydrogeologists and permit writers would ordinarily do. This helps free up Ecology staff to work with other applicants’ on their water right applications.
The consultant conducts a site investigation, performs the environmental and hydrogeologic analyses, identifies whether the water is available or would impair other water users, prepares a report with his or her findings, and recommends whether to approve the application.
Ecology makes the final decision on the application.
Q: What is the advantage of using cost
A: Cost reimbursement generally results in a quicker decision because the resources of a consulting firm are dedicated to the investigation of a particular application. A decision may be obtained within a matter of months rather than a matter of years. The time will vary according to the complexity of the proposal and the number of competing applications that may need to be addressed.
Q: What are the disadvantages of cost
A: For an applicant, the key disadvantage is cost. The cost may be beyond the ability of many applicants to pay. Applicants who choose to wait for Ecology to process their application pay a minimum fee of $50 per application, plus the public notice costs. The actual costs of processing an application are significantly greater, but those additional costs are paid out of the agency’s own budget, using tax dollars. No application fee is required if a party enters into a Cost Reimbursement Agreement.
An applicant who enters a Cost Reimbursement Agreement is expected to pay the full cost of processing the application, and in some cases, other senior applications – including the cost it takes to hire a consulting firm. (Applications for the same water body are usually processed in the order received. “Senior applications” are those with an earlier submittal date than the one in question.) In addition to the contracting costs, the applicant is expected to pay the costs of Ecology staff time spent reviewing the work of the consultant and managing the contract.
Q: How much does the cost reimbursement
A: The costs can range from a few thousand dollars to, in exceptional cases, hundreds of thousands of dollars. The cost will vary according to the number and complexity of applications, the fees charged by the consultant and the number of hours that Ecology must spend reviewing the work of the consultant.
It is important for applicants to understand that consultants are permitted to do only what it is provided for in their contracts as approved by Ecology. And applicants are expected to fully pay for those costs. To gather important data about the effects of a proposed withdrawal, a consultant may find it necessary to drill test wells and perform pump tests. This could add to the costs significantly.
In addition, as the investigation of a particular water right application proceeds, new issues may arise that were not identified during the initial scoping process. In such cases it may be necessary to develop amendments to the existing agreement to expand the scope, increase the budget, or extend deadlines.
Q: How does an applicant initiate the cost
A: Ecology recommends that any applicant considering the cost reimbursement process first consult with Ecology regional staff. Regional staff will be able to give an applicant an idea of how many other applications are in the same watershed, share their knowledge of watershed issues and provide an initial impression of the likelihood that water will be available.
Ecology staff also will be able to discuss what type of costs the applicant must pay, such as:
Q: How does the cost reimbursement process
A: The cost reimbursement process is broken into two distinct phases. Phase One includes a thorough analysis of the water source boundaries and other existing applications. This can be done by an applicant and his or her consultant, or by Ecology’s consultant.
Phase Two consists of preparing technical reports supporting the decision on the water right request, and must be done by Ecology’s consultant.
In Phase One, the application is evaluated to identify the boundaries of the source of water. This is the area that could be affected by a proposed water withdrawal. In the case of groundwater applications, this requires a preliminary delineation of the affected aquifer. A Phase One analysis includes looking at whether there are other prior applications requesting water from the same source. It will also identify likely issues that require further evaluation, and may provide a scope and cost estimate for completing Phase Two of the evaluation.
Applicant has opportunities to stop the process at several junctures
A Phase One analysis typically costs between $5,000 and $10,000. If the applicant accepts the proposal, a written contract is developed and signed by the applicant and Ecology. Ecology’s consultant is then assigned the task of performing a Phase One analysis. If the costs are too high, the applicant may choose not to pursue the process any further. Upon completion of the Phase One analysis, an applicant once again has the option to stop the process.
In Phase Two, Ecology’s consultant prepares a Report of Examination (Ecology’s decision) for the application(s). The Report of Examination consists of technical reports which investigate the issues of water availability and the potential for impairment to other water right holders.
If the applicant had Ecology contract with a pre-approved consultant to conduct Phase One, a report will be provided to the applicant with scope and a cost estimate for Phase Two. If the applicant used his or her own consultant in Phase One, the report will be forwarded to Ecology’s consultant (chosen by the applicant from Ecology’s pre-approved list). With the report will be a request to provide a scope and cost estimate for Phase Two.
Q: What kinds of payment options are
A: In general there are two payment options for a cost reimbursement agreement. The first is a full pre-payment of the costs identified in the agreement. The second is to provide Ecology with a $5,000 security deposit and the applicant will be billed as Ecology receives invoices from our consultant.
Under the first option, any funds that are not used at the completion of the project would be refunded. Under the second option, the security deposit is refunded at the completion of the project.
Q: Does entering into a Cost Reimbursement Agreement
allow me to jump to the head of the line?
A: In some cases, yes. Under usual circumstances, Ecology must process applications for the same source of water in the order they are received. (The oldest, or most senior, are processed first.) However there is more flexibility under the new laws (RCW 90.03.265). If your water request won’t reduce the water available for senior applicants, you can have your application handled under a Cost Reimbursement Agreement without processing the senior applications.
Q: Does entering a Cost Reimbursement Agreement
automatically mean my application will be approved?
A: No. A Cost Reimbursement Agreement only provides that a decision may be made. That decision could be approval or denial of the application(s). If it looks like the decision will be a denial, you will be so notified and will have the option of ending the agreement to save on costs.
Q: Can I appeal a decision on my water-right
application? Who pays for the appeal?
A: You may appeal a decision if you disagree. In such cases, you are responsible for paying for the legal costs of your own appeal. Ecology’s decisions on water rights are defended by the state Attorney General Office. If a third party appeals a decision, you may be responsible for reimbursing the state for the cost of defending the decision before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). Ecology may negotiate further reimbursement if the decision is appealed beyond the PCHB.
Copyright © Washington State Department of Ecology. See http://www.ecy.wa.gov/copyright.htm