
The Department of Ecology (Ecology) has been working to transform and focus the agency’s permitting processes and interactions around the following vision:
The citizens of Washington trust that our employees will support and assist them in promoting the sustainable environmental and economic well-being of the state.
Our goal is to:
Ecology is Washington State’s primary environmental protection agency. A survey has been conducted every two years since 2002 of individuals and businesses who applied for permits to:
Ecology contracted with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) to conduct an independent, neutral administration of a customer satisfaction survey; and collection, validation and compilation of the results.
The 2002 survey was a mail survey with a phone call follow-up to non-responders. The response rate dramatically increased in 2002 when the phone follow-up was conducted. The subsequent surveys were conducted by phone only. The sample groups included persons or businesses who had applied for a permit from Ecology since the previous survey had been conducted.
Ecology has received consistently high marks for responsiveness to its permit customers. Over the next few months, the agency will be analyzing the survey data to identify specific areas for improving its permit processes. The full report will be available January 31, 2011.
|
Percent Agreed or
Strongly Agreed |
|||||
|
Ecology Staff: |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
|
Were helpful |
86 |
94 |
92 |
92 |
91 |
|
Were friendly |
93 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
|
Listened |
89 |
93 |
94 |
92 |
93 |
|
Used professional judgment |
80 |
91 |
90 |
91 |
90 |
|
Communicated clearly |
83 |
91 |
91 |
90 |
90 |
|
Viewed applicant as partner |
71 |
88 |
83 |
83 |
86 |
|
Worked to build a cooperative relationship |
74 |
89 |
88 |
88 |
88 |
|
Worked with applicant on innovative solutions |
64 |
84 |
78 |
77 |
78 |
|
Told applicant what was needed to submit a
complete application |
87 |
91 |
92 |
93 |
93 |
|
Answered applicants questions about the process |
87 |
93 |
95 |
96 |
95 |
|
Told applicant how long the decision would take |
67 |
80 |
75 |
79 |
76 |
|
The Permit: |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
|
Forms were easy to use |
67 |
85 |
82 |
78 |
80 |
|
Application instructions were clear |
68 |
87 |
87 |
84 |
86 |
|
Environmental standards were clear |
65 |
84 |
84 |
81 |
83 |
|
Decision was timely |
63 |
84 |
81 |
81 |
83 |
|
Decision was clear |
79 |
89 |
93 |
91 |
93 |
|
Time to issue the permit was reasonable |
Not Asked |
83 |
80 |
80 |
82 |
|
Permit conditions are reasonable |
Not Asked |
81 |
81 |
80 |
81 |
|
Reporting requirements are reasonable |
Not Asked |
80 |
84 |
81 |
81 |
|
Monitoring requirements are reasonable |
Not Asked |
79 |
81 |
78 |
81 |
|
Satisfaction with Response Time to: |
2002 |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
|
Phone calls |
82 |
95 |
94 |
92 |
90 |
|
Emails |
83 |
95 |
96 |
93 |
91 |
|
Letters |
70 |
93 |
90 |
88 |
88 |
|
Website Use |
2004 |
2006 |
2008 |
2010 |
|
|
Was the Ecology website used to find permit
information |
Yes |
32 |
45 |
42 |
53 |
|
Was it easy to find the information on the Ecology
website |
Yes |
83 |
83 |
84 |
80 |
|
Was the permit information helpful |
Yes |
98 |
92 |
92 |
89 |
Copyright © Washington State Department of Ecology. See http://www.ecy.wa.gov/copyright.html.